Abstract
The two-step analysis in Mayo is insufficient to objectively analyze and make consistent determinations on patent eligibility. The effects of Alice are prime exhibits of this conclusion. Uncertainty and confusion in the realm of patents and software technology have risen to such a level that there is a telling impact on the economy and perhaps far greater devastation to the economy on the horizon. At the same time, the patent prosecution process has become increasingly expensive and difficult for both the client and drafting attorney provided the sheer number of Section rejections that are challenging to overcome. Consequently, this Note contends that two supplemental requirements would assist in remedying the Alice predicament.
Recommended Citation
Swan, Steven
(2016)
"Plugging the Rabbit Hole: The Supreme Court's Decision in Alice,"
Utah Law Review: Vol. 2016:
No.
5, Article 5.
Available at:
https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2016/iss5/5