Abstract
Debates about non-state normative communities often devolve into clashes between two polarized positions. On the one hand, we see the desire to eradicate difference through forced obeisance to a single overarching state norm. On the other, we see claims of complete autonomy for non-state lawmaking, as if such non-state communities could plausibly exist in isolation from the communities that both surround and intersect them.
Recommended Citation
Gedicks, Paul Schiff
(2010)
"Towards a Jurisprudence of Hybridity,"
Utah Law Review: Vol. 2010:
No.
1, Article 3.
Available at:
https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2010/iss1/3
COinS