Abstract
Everything which is a source of solidarity is moral, everything which forces man to take account of other men is moral, everything which forces him to regulate his conduct through something other than the striving of his ego is moral, and morality is as solid as these ties are numerous and strong. We can see how inexact it is to define it, as is often done, through liberty. It rather consists in a state of dependence. Far from serving to emancipate the individual, or disengaging him from the environment which surrounds him, it has, on the contrary, the function of making him an integral part of a whole, and, consequently, of depriving him of some liberty of movement. We sometimes, it is true, come across people not without nobility who find the idea of such dependence intolerable. But that is because they do not perceive the source from which their own morality flows, since these sources are very deep.
Recommended Citation
Schneider, Carl E.
(1994)
"Marriage, Morals, and the Law:
No-Fault Divorce and Moral Discourse,"
Utah Law Review: Vol. 1994:
No.
2, Article 2.
Available at:
https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol1994/iss2/2