Abstract
This Note argues that the federal courts should either give full deference to the EEOC’s recent decision under the deference principles laid out in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. or should adopt the EEOC’s interpretation as persuasive under Skidmore v. Swift & Co.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63140/tor8zpbpnj
Recommended Citation
Taylor, Laura Anne
(2013)
"A Win for Transgender Employees: Chevron Deference for the EEOC’s Decision in Macy v. Holder,"
Utah Law Review: Vol. 2013:
No.
4, Article 7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63140/tor8zpbpnj
Available at:
https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2013/iss4/7
COinS