This Article shows that the new two-step patent-eligibility test is not as unadministrable as at least its most ardent critics have suggested. More research is necessary to ascertain how much better the attorneys would have predicted court outcomes had they spent more time on their predictions and had access to more information.
Reinecke, Jason D.
"Is the Supreme Court’s Patentable Subject Matter Test Overly Ambiguous? An Empirical Test,"
Utah Law Review: Vol. 2019:
3, Article 2.
Available at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2019/iss3/2