Abstract
For almost two centuries of this nation’s history, the basic contours of the fundamental right to marry were fairly clear as a matter of natural, not constitutional, law. The right encompassed marriage’s essential characteristics: conjugality and contract, portability and permanence. This Article defines those four dimensions of the natural right to marry and describes their reflections and contradictions in positive law prior to Loving v. Virginia (1967). In that landmark case, the Supreme Court enforced a constitutional “freedom to marry” just when marriage’s definitive attributes were on the brink of legal collapse. Not only did wedlock proceed in Loving’s wake to lose its exclusive claims to licit sex and legitimate procreation, personal autonomy in those very domains gained independent constitutional protection. Drained of its conjugal essence, today’s constitutional right to marry is thus an anachronism, the vestige of a bygone consensus about what, if anything, “marriage” fundamentally is.
DOI
10.26054/0KFFY1GN4Y
Recommended Citation
Boucai, Michael
(2020)
"Before Loving: The Lost Origins of the Right to Marry,"
Utah Law Review: Vol. 2020:
No.
1, Article 2.
DOI: 10.26054/0KFFY1GN4Y
Available at:
https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2020/iss1/2